Sharing and building Solution Focused practice in organisations

Is organisational work different to therapy

Carey Glass, one of the editors of InterAction, posed this question to us all after publication of the article in the latest InterAction bt Christine Kuch and Susanne Burgstaller - Their article is available at

Here is my response:

 The case studies presented in this article make good reading and I would describe them as recognisable pieces of SF work.  However, the introduction and conclusion confuse me, especially as I read the article with Occam’s Razor close at hand. I do not understand the importance the authors give to the distinction between the organisation and the people in it – nor what implications they see for SF organisational developers in the future.

Perhaps this goes to the heart of what is radical about the SF way of thinking, stemming from the interactional view pioneered by Gregory Bateson, John Weakland and the Mental Research Institute.

In keeping with the interactional view, I challenge the premise that the organisation is “in part independent of the people who are working in it ..... People are relevant  for the organisation not only as specific individuals, but also as representatives of their specific roles. The consequence of this description is that individuals are interchangeable.”  In SF-land, we take the position that every case is different – and so is every Finance Director!  Introducing the idea of the organisation as a separate entity adds an unnecessary element of complexity to our work, one that can be shaved away with benefit to clients and practitioners.  People and the way they act and interact ARE the organisation, and the procedures and processes people have devised to further their aims can be changed when they are no longer effective or efficient.

The literature now contains many cases and descriptions of OD work using SF – see for example previous editions of InterAction, Solution-Focused Management edited by Günter Lueger and Hans-Peter Korn,  Daniel Meier’s book Team Coaching with the SolutionCircle and Solution Focus Working edited by Mark McKergow and me. 

In the cases presented by Christine Kuch and Susanne Burgstaller, the authors were asked to help their clients with mediation or conflict resolution.  What characterises the SF consultants’ approach is to turn the focus away from what is wrong (interpersonal conflict in these cases) towards what is wanted.   Naturally the participants are preoccupied with what is wrong and the shift in focus can take time.  This is the art of platform building, an often overlooked tool in the SF tool box, as described in my article in Solution-Focused Management (Lueger & Korn, 357 – 362).  

 In the first case, what was wanted  was revealed in the second workshop as better preparation of the core meeting; in the second case, the focus was shifted to the task: what are we trying to do here, and how could that be achieved in an ideal world? 

The question “what are we trying to achieve?” is often a good starting point in building a secure platform, especially in mature organisations which tend to take the answer to that question for granted, without regularly checking that it is still relevant and widely understood within the organisation.   SF consultants know that time spent in this phase is well spent: it gives clients confidence that they have been listened to and their concerns taken seriously AND that they have some idea of the direction they want to go and the benefits of setting off in that direction.  As well as choosing the next small steps in the desired direction, we might spend some time casting back a step or two from the Future Perfect to ask “what do we need to have in place in order to support this?”   This is an elegant way of looking at the processes and interfaces as described in the two case studies which does not require any OD “expertise”.

In summary, I cannot see the added benefit of viewing organisations as somehow separate and different from the people working within them – a distinction which seems to me to be contrary to the SF tradition and, at the very best, redundant in the task of making progress in a desirable direction.  


Jenny Clarke, sfwork, UK  Contact



Lueger, G. & Korn, H-P. (2006). Solution-Focused Management. Rainer Hampp Verlag

McKergow, M. & Clarke, J. (2007).  Solutions Focus Working. Solutions Books

Meier, D. (2005). Team Coaching with the SolutionCircle.  Solutions Books

Views: 297

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of SOLWorld to add comments!

Join SOLWorld




Jumpstart into Solution Focus

You want to learn more about "Solution Focus"?

You prefer a "step by step" introduction instead to start with reading some
voluminous books?

You would appreciate to have a complete "helicopter view" on SF after the first step…


Created by Hans-Peter Korn Dec 25, 2009 at 10:25am. Last updated by Mark McKergow Nov 3, 2014.

Making the most of

If you’ve just arrived at (the SOLWorld ning group), you may be looking at all the features and wondering where to start.  This note might be helpful…



Created by Mark McKergow Jun 3, 2008 at 4:55pm. Last updated by Jesper H Christiansen Aug 22, 2017.

Open Space at SOLworld conferences

SOLworld Open Space instructions as it was used at the 2011 conference, by Mark McKergow


Created by Katalin Hankovszky Dec 30, 2015 at 10:18pm. Last updated by Katalin Hankovszky Dec 30, 2015.

SOLWorld Resources

Welcome to the SOLWorld Resources section.  This part of the site features information about the SOLWorld network, our past events and materials from our previous website.  It will take some time to update all the information, so thanks for your patience. 

Information in this part of the site is 'read-only'.  If you want to start discussions, please go to the Forum or Groups. …


Created by Mark McKergow May 12, 2008 at 4:08pm. Last updated by Mark McKergow Dec 2, 2022.

© 2024   Created by Mark McKergow.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service